Bankruptcy experts in the US said they were astonished at the ruling last Thursday by a federal bankruptcy judge in Texas, which claimed jurisdiction over the bankruptcy of Yukos based largely on the fact that the company paid a retainer to a US law firm to represent it in the proceedings.
Judge Clark said she took the action because "participants in international commerce, in Russia, in the United States, and elsewhere, need to have an expectation that when they invest in foreign enterprises they may do so without fear that their investments may be the subject of confiscatory action by agencies of the foreign government."
Legal experts said the ruling raised the prospect that any firm in financial distress, anywhere in the world, could open a small bank account in the US and use that to claim bankruptcy protection under US law.
"This is open sesame for foreign debtors," says Professor Jay Westbrook of the University of Texas law school. "This is not just a can of worms - it is a whole barrel of worms."
Citing what it called high-ranking Western financial sources, the ITAR-Tass agency said the banking group had decided to freeze the deal at least until the U.S. court reaches a final decision.
With a big presence in the United States, the banks could face legal action if they violated the court order.
If Gazprom can't get the loans to buy out Yuganskneftegaz because of a Texas court ruling, then where does U.S. oil influence stop?
Alexander Stepanenko, a spokesman for the Gazprom oil unit, said the company was committed to bidding on Sunday and the company had received no notification from the western banks that they would be canceling their funding.
"We've made an application, made the deposit and received permission from the anti-monopoly service," he said.
Even Yukos's lawyers agreed that the auction will go ahead.
"We remain realistic about the ruling's immediate effect," the company said in a written statement.
Boy, I don't know......but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment