Thursday, September 30, 2004

Get off that dead horse, fool

That's an old Navajo proverb. Paraphrased.

G.D. Frogsdong is urging the Illinois GOP to abandon Alan Keyes and instead run General J.C. Christian for Pimpin' Jack Ryan's abandoned Senate seat. See if you don't agree that it's a very persuasive letter he's written.

...or do what you want...you will anyway.

Support our troops

Demand that Congress lift the abortion ban on female troops.

Did you know that the military won't cover the cost of abortion, even if the servicewoman has been raped? But the military does cover the cost of cosmetic surgery, including breast implants, nose jobs, and liposuction!

A ban on military abortions forces soldiers who become pregnant while serving overseas to seek abortions at private clinics and to pay for the procedure themselves, making it difficult and costly to end a pregnancy. Worse yet, the ban leaves women serving in countries where abortion is illegal - like Iraq and Afghanistan - nowhere to turn, effectively depriving them of freedom of choice.

Fill out the form to add your name to a petition asking Congress to lift the ban.

I found this link at another fine blog: The Fulcrum. Pay a visit. Leave a kind word.

Because he needs all the help he can get

The machine grinds at exceeding high speed.

The Bush campaign has set up a network of Web sites to carry instant analysis of tonight's debate.

The "Debate Feed" will provide the GOP spin in real time to as many as 5,000 conservative Web outlets, according to Wired News. "Our rapid response effort is based on the premise that no attack or no misstatement will go unchallenged," Michael Turk, director of the Internet campaign, told the Web site. A "war room" is outfitted with 15 computers and two TVs, monitored by two dozen staffers, ready to send out a Republican response or comment, Wired added.

The Kerry campaign is not so well organized. It has e-mailed supporters who work with local newspapers and media, telling them the Kerry campaign will provide a response after the debate, Wired reported.
article

Iraq's president calls out BushCo

You forgot Iraq has a president? Well, you're forgiven. It's not like you ever hear anything about him. So check this out from Juan Cole:

Iraqi President Ghazi al-Yawir strongly protested US air strikes against Iraqi cities, comparing them to Israeli tactics in Gaza and branding them a form of "collective punishment." Collective punishment was a Nazi tactic during World War II, and was forbidden as a tool to occupying powers in the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949. Al-Yawir's condemnation of the US use of the tactic is the strongest to date from a high-level Iraqi politician. The comments seem likely to create a diplomatic crisis, and bode ill for Bush administration plans to pursue a scorched earth campaign against Fallujah and other cities in al-Anbar province in November. Al-Yawir is from a Sunni tribal background.

Or else Yawir is about to become an unfortunate victim of a car bomb.

Presidential pressure

Several high-profile FBI investigations, in which substantial progress have been made, may well have been put on hold by the Bush administration for political reasons. That is, it has been alleged to me that the White House may have leaned on the FBI-- not to drop the investigations but to postpone some key arrests until after the November elections.

Oh! Now you've gone too far! You cannot expect me to believe he would do something like that.

But read the rest of Juan Cole's post, as he defines neconservatives and discusses the cases that the WH is allegedly pressuring the FBI to put on hold. Or stay ignorant. I don't care.

...do what you want...you will anyway.

One simple question

Rude Pundit has listed some of the entries to his challenge to come up with one question to ask the Liar in Chief. (If you have just joined us, RP's challenge comes from this website's challenge.) My favorites:

David Stabb narrows the field of dead non-Christians to this: "Do you believe that Jewish, Muslim, agnostic and other American soldiers who have not accepted Jesus as their personal savior and that have been killed in Iraq will be allowed into Heaven?"

From Sarah: "Would you say that the life of an American is worth more, less, or about the same as the life of an Iraqi?"

King asks, "How do you respond to terrorists who have said they want you to win?"

And of course...

Bob Goodsell inquires, "Your father said that people who disclose the identities of CIA agents are the most insidious of traitors. One of these traitors has been operating in your administration for over a year now. Why haven't you done anything about it?"

...And, finally, the Rude Pundit's favorite question, Ian asks, simply, eloquently, of the President:
"What is the moral of My Pet Goat?"

There will be more next week, before the next debate, so keep the questions coming to rudepundit@yahoo.com.

Read the others here.

...or do what you want...you will anyway.

P.S. Over at Electrolite, someone asks if anyone knows the answer to the original "One Simple Question", and someone else answers: Not enough. Ha!

Hurry up with the fascism, Neal Boortz can't wait

But you just know there are plenty of people who believe the same thing.
I am now and have been for years a firm advocate of developing a system to limit the people who can vote in this country. We need to find a way to restrict the number of people who can vote. If we don’t weed out the chaff soon it may well be too late.

Don’t give me that “democracy” nonsense. In spite of what you hear from your government school teacher, your leftist college professor, or that smiling talking head on television, we are not a democracy. Never were. Weren’t supposed to be. You won’t find the word “democracy” in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States or in any constitution of any of the 50 States. There’s a reason for that. Our founding fathers hated the idea of democracy. They knew that a government of majority rule would dissolve into a tyranny of plunder and chaos.

...Welfare recipients. Those who depend on government forced income redistribution should stay at home on election day and enjoy the fruits of plunder.

...For those of you who do believe strongly that everyone should be able to vote, I have an alternate proposal. President Calvin Coolidge once said that “The business of America is business.” Let’s put that concept to work at the voting booth. Let’s treat America like a business and make every American a shareholder. Shareholders get to vote their shares at the shareholder’s meeting every two years.

Did I say shares? Plural? Yup. Just as with any business corporation, not everyone has the same number of shares.
article

From the author who brought you...

I came across that brilliant analysis from a post at A Chicken Is Not Pillage. Excerpt:

His thesis: that the rich should have more voting power than the poor...
Don’t you just love it? The people who actually fuel our economy with their hard work and attention to decisions will get a greater voice in the direction our country takes! What a concept!
Yes, what an anti-Democratic, fascist corruption fueling and blatantly treason fraught concept...This is the very pit of hell suggested by Bush's "Ownership" society. Them as own make the rules for them to own. And fuck the rest. There is the right wing agenda of the Bush administration, portrayed in black and white. How conservative can you get ... harkening back to the days of male landowners having the franchise, and the rest bowing to their will.

And here's the "intriguing" part that Wulfgar left out of the ACINP post...

Just how do you acquire shares in America, Inc.? Well, you have one share issued to you just by virtue of your being a citizen. You buy additional shares by paying income taxes. Sounds intriguing, doesn’t it?

Oh, it most certainly does. Because then all those assholes engaging in tax loopholes and shelters would have to start actually paying taxes, instead of trying to get around it.

If they wanted to vote, that is.

Jerkwad.

Unethical DeLay

About those illegal corporate contributions...

U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay and Texas Speaker Tom Craddick quickly distanced themselves from a GOP political action committee this week after a state grand jury indicted three of the group's consultants.

But a Houston Chronicle review of documents from civil lawsuits and government databases involving Texans for a Republican Majority show DeLay and Craddick were kept abreast of the PAC's operations and were personally involved in the committee's fund-raising activities.

...In the wake of the felony indictments returned Tuesday, though, DeLay and Craddick describe a hands-off relationship with TRMPAC.

"I had no idea what they were doing," Craddick said.

DeLay said, "I was not involved in the day-to-day operations of TRMPAC ... I raised money for them and made appearances for them when they had fund-raisers."

...A flier for [a] fund-raiser featuring Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris listed the "TRMPAC Board" as being headed by DeLay. "Corporate Contributions are Welcome."

...DeLay's daughter and personal political consultants ran TRMPAC. DeLay was on the board of advisers and was the featured guest at fund-raisers.
Houston Chronicle article

But he had no idea that they were involved in anything felonious. How could you imagine he did? Like Oil Slick Dick who had no idea his companies were crooks. Paul O'Neill, the Secretary of the Treasury that BushCo fired, pushed to create laws that would make CEOs legally accountable for the activities of their companies, but as you can imagine, corporate contributors lobbied that out of existence.

The grand jury — under the direction of Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle, a Democrat — indicted John Colyandro, TRMPAC's executive director; Jim Ellis, the executive director of DeLay's leadership committee Americans for a Republican Majority; and Warren RoBold, a fund-raising consultant for both political committees. Eight corporations also were indicted.

The indictments accuse the men and corporations of violating a state law banning the use of corporate or labor-union donations to influence the outcome of a candidate's election. They have denied wrongdoing.

Frankly, I'm sure they don't see anything wrong with what they did.

And it's very handy for DeLay that four of the ten members of the ethics committee investigating his illegal fund-raising are recipients of thousands of dollars from ARMPAC, the parent of DeLay's political action committees, and the fifth Republican on the committee is the chairman.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

AWOL

President Bush, accused by Democrats of shirking his duty in the Texas Air National Guard during the Vietnam War, wrote that he had "inadequate time" to meet future reserve commitments in his November 1974 letter of resignation, which was released Wednesday.

The letter was released by the White House on the eve of the first presidential debate, in Miami on Thursday, between Bush and his Democratic challenger, John F. Kerry, a decorated Vietnam veteran.

In the one-page "Tender of Resignation," Bush hand-wrote the following reason for resigning: "Inadequate time to fullfill [sic] possible future commitments."

The document does not address the controversy over gaps in his service in the Air National Guard in the 1970s.
WaPo article

Funny how they keep coming up with a record here, a record there, after insisting on numerous occasions in the past that they had provided all the documents from his service record. Ooops, found another one. Ooops, yet another one. Ooops...

Like a damned Easter egg hunt. Bunnypants (as he's sometimes known at Maru's) apparently has them hidden all over Washington.

Keep looking. I'm sure there's another there somewhere.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Presidential Auction 2004

The U.S. television networks planning live coverage of the presidential debates said on Wednesday they would disregard ground rules set by the two campaigns to control camera shots of the candidates.

And the nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates, which is not a party to the agreement, said it could not be expected to enforce strictures on network coverage of the four debates.

At issue are rules that bar the networks from airing "cutaway" shots of either Republican President Bush or Democratic challenger John Kerry while they are waiting their turn to speak during the debates.

If this restriction had been enforced in the past, it would have censored the heavy sighs and disapproving expressions of Vice President Al Gore during the 2000 debates or the shot of Bush's father glancing at his watch during a 1992 debate with Bill Clinton and Ross Perot.

The rules, signed by the managers of the two campaigns, also prohibit the cameras from panning to members of the audience during the question-and-answer periods.

...In addition, all four broadcast journalists chosen as moderators for the debates -- Charles Gibson of ABC and Bob Schieffer of CBS, and Jim Lehrer and Gwen Ifill of the Public Broadcasting Service -- have refused to sign the 32-page agreement governing conduct of the events.

"That's an agreement between the candidates. It's not an agreement between the moderators, who are independent journalists," said Frank Fahrenkopf, Republican co-chairman of the debate commission.

He also said the commission has declined to sign the document on grounds that doing so would jeopardize the tax-exempt, nonpartisan status that allows his group to sponsor the debates.
Reuters article

I guess they'll just have to stand at attention, pay attention, and not pick their noses. It'll be tough for one of them at least.


Photo courtesy Maru

Global warming

The Russian government has approved the Kyoto Protocol on global warming, clearing the way for parliament to vote on ratification of the pact.

...The United States has rejected the pact, but it would have enough support to take effect if Russia ratifies it.
article

And I expect they will. It's their possible ticket into the World Trade Organization.

Presidential Auction 2004

Asked if he thought Bush were smart, Kerry said: "Absolutely. He's a very clever debater. ... He's president. Anybody who doubts that somebody who isn't smart as president doesn't know what it's all about."
article

Need I comment?

ACLU vs. John AssKKKroft & BushCo PATRIOTS

At least some of our courts are still reading the Constitution.

Saying that "democracy abhors undue secrecy," a federal court today struck down an entire Patriot Act provision that gives the government unchecked authority to issue "National Security Letters" to obtain sensitive customer records from Internet Service Providers and other businesses without judicial oversight. The court also found a broad gag provision in the law to be an "unconstitutional prior restraint" on free speech.
ACLU article

And it was a hard won case.

Since filing the case, the ACLU has labored under a broad gag order under which the government sought at every turn to censor even the most innocuous, non-sensitive information about the case. (The ACLU created a special web page to display the types of information it was forced to ask the court to disclose publicly, online at www.aclu.org/gagorder)

My homage to courts who uphold our civil liberties is here.

"This is a landmark victory against the Ashcroft Justice Department’s misguided attempt to intrude into the lives of innocent Americans in the name of national security," said ACLU Executive Director Anthony D. Romero. "Even now, some in Congress are trying to pass additional intrusive law enforcement powers. This decision should put a halt to those efforts."

I doubt it, but it's a step in the right direction. And make your celebration quick, because they're not going to give up.

U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft said on Thursday the Bush administration was likely to appeal against a U.S. District Court ruling that part of the Patriot Act was unconstitutional.
Reuters article

Wednesday, September 29, 2004

Musical Hair

I've had a little time this morning to look at some of the posts at Musical Hair's Musings. Here are a few gems...


The wealth Byzantium had at it's height remains incomprehensible, the wealth of Western Europe still to this day can count the spoils stolen from the pillage from Constantinople around 900 AD, and civic treasures in European cities are often remnants of art stolen and transported piece by piece from Constantinople. The empire was so strong that after they recaptured their capital with virtually all it's wealth stolen it stood for almost 500 more years, slowly crumbling behind walls.

These walls I refer to are not just physical. They had built up walls of smugness and pride from centuries of being the most wealthy, most cultured, most educated, most worldly, most Christian people. They felt that they were the society and empire of God on Earth, their fall could only be followed by Christ's return. After all, Constantine himself built their capital; time and hard work made it the jewel of Christianity never equalled before nor to this day. This gave them an arrogance that never faded even as the the Turks killed off all resistance and found, along side this pride, abject poverty in a society that mustered all it's resources for it's millitary protection and it's final stand.

I was thinking about corporate responsibility and how there isn't any and I stumbled into a kind of scarry idea. We all know that corporations have all the rights of people with no illnesses, no death awaiting them, nothing to punish them for wrong doings, no fear of jail time, maybe an occassional fine. A lawyer may represent a corporation in a legal proceeding, but since that corporation is not a human it doesn't have to be in court....

...Law started and remains as a non-human entity with all the fickle preferences of a Greek God or demon. Selective enforcement may be random like some traffic tickets or intentionally biased like arresting black kids selling weed to white kids and letting the white kids drive off, or pulling over black motorists instead of white.

The failure of this nation starts where the Democrats and Republicans agree. Every pot hole you bounce over this winter, thank your representative for the tax cut. Every dead soldier, every child in poverty, every new asthma case: thank your representative, Democrat or Republican.

A conclusion is what you or I arrive at after a thought process and weighing the facts and principles, but for the fundamentalist a conclusion is drawn up from a set of preconceptions that are in service to a goal.

We're at a point where the lack of reasoning on the part of the right is useless to even look at. It is circular, void of any basis in the real world, and just plain stupid. We must instead look at their goals. Endless war, no science, no civil rights, no consumer protection, no cross-cultural understanding, no truth, no accoutability.

I'll put up a permanent link in the sidebar to Musical Hair's Musings. I am trying to keep that blog list short, because when I visit another blog and see a bajillion blog links, it sets up a psychological block: "Too much. No time for all, so where to start? Don't look." So I want my list to look manageable from first glance. It's hard to choose to leave out some blogs, but such is life. If you'd like to see more links to other good blogs and good websites (ahem, according to me), I have a more extensive list on my webpage here.

If you want more information on the topic of corporate responsibility and personhood, I have a number of articles linked on my webpage here.

If you want more commentary about fundamentalism and the single party posing as two, just stick around.

And visit Musical Hair.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Outsourcing torture

As it stands now, "extraordinary rendition" is a clear violation of international law--specifically, the U.N. Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Degrading and Inhuman Treatment. U.S. law is less clear. We signed and ratified the Convention Against Torture, but we ratified it with some reservations. They might create a loophole that allows us to send a prisoner to Egypt or Syria or Jordan if we get "assurances" that they will not torture a prisoner--even if these assurances are false and we know they are false.

Last month Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Congressman, introduced a bill that would clearly outlaw extraordinary rendition. But Markey only has 22 cosponsors, and now the House leadership is trying to legalize torture outsourcing--and hide it in the bill implementing the 9/11 Commission Report.

More...

CIA money for Iraq elections - Addendum

Rice spokesman Sean McCormack says, "I cannot in any way comment on classified matters, the existence or nonexistence of findings."..."In the final analysis, we have adopted a policy that we will not try to influence the outcome of the upcoming Iraqi election by covertly helping individual candidates for office."
Time article

"Now that some schmuck, who can expect to be taken off at the knees, leaked and we got busted," he didn't add.

A senior U.S. official hinted that, under pressure from the Hill, the Administration scaled back its original plans. "This was a tough call. We went back and forth on it in the U.S. government. We consulted the Hill on this question ... Our embassy in Baghdad will run a number of overt programs to support the democratic electoral process," as the U.S. does elsewhere in the world.

Amazingly enough they can just admit publicly now that they make and carry out covert plans unless they get caught and "pressured", because the public obvious doesn't give a rat's ass. Or maybe the public agrees that we should be messing in other country's politics. And definitely the public is too gullible to think that those "overt" programs provide cover for the "covert" programs.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Free campaign time

Maru has a bit of the transcript from installment one of Beavis and Butthead on Fox. Unsurprisingly, we are going to be treated to a continuation of catchy phrases that Butthead can remember and blame shifting. The Congress, you will note, has got to be "fiscally wise" with "our money". But do read Maru's transcript. It's, well....it's Maru. And, in a previous post, she nails the phrases you will be most likely to hear in the "debates".

Some of what we think will be GW Bush's talking points during the debates:
- 9/11 changed everything
- Saddam used weapons against his own people!
- If I have to choose between taking the word of a madman and protecting the 'Merican people, I choose the 'Merican people everytime.
- The world is better off without Saddam in power
- I inherited a recession
- He's gonna raise taxes
- We're turnin' the corner
- Mixed messages embolden the terrists/hurt our troops
- Saddam refused to let the inspectors in
- Changin' his position

The man is a broken record of trite advertising jingles.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Presidential Auction 2004 - Iraq exit strategy

[F]or all their squabbling on the campaign stump, both presidential candidates actually share a common commitment to Iraq -- and have many of the same long-term goals. They have both pledged to keep U.S.troops in Iraq for years, acknowledging that a modicum of stability is a prerequisite for leaving. They have both identified rebuilding the Iraqi army as the key to an eventual exit strategy.
article

"It is getting worse," agreed an Army staff officer who served in Iraq and stays in touch with comrades in Baghdad through e-mail. "It just seems there is a lot of pessimism flowing out of theater now. There are things going on that are unbelievable to me. They have infiltrators conducting attacks in the Green Zone. That was not the case a year ago."

... Reports from Iraq have made one Army staff officer question whether adequate progress is being made there.

"They keep telling us that Iraqi security forces are the exit strategy, but what I hear from the ground is that they aren't working," he said. "There's a feeling that Iraqi security forces are in cahoots with the insurgents and the general public to get the occupiers out."

He added: "I hope I'm wrong."

article

[12/10/03] Plans to deploy the first battalion of Iraq's new army are in doubt because a third of the soldiers trained by the U.S.-led occupation authority have quit, defense officials said Wednesday.
article

[12/13/03] Faced with the desertion of nearly half the new Iraqi army, the U.S. military is thinking about raising the pay scale for Iraqi soldiers as it trains more to join the force, the commander of U.S.-led coalition forces in Iraq said Saturday.
article

[5/7/04] U.S. Marines last week disbanded the controversial Al-Fallujah Brigade after it became clear that brigade members were actively assisting militants in the city, international media has reported. The brigade was formed in April in an effort to bring an end to weeks of intense fighting between U.S. forces and militants opposed to the occupation.
article

[9/26/04] The man chosen to lead the Iraqi National Guard in a province in the so-called Sunni triangle has been arrested by U.S. forces on the suspicion that he has ties to insurgent fighters, a U.S. Army spokesman said.
article

Ready for November

If matching presidential candidates to their positions on basic issues were like a "Jeopardy!" category, most Americans wouldn't earn a single dollar.

More than half of those polled by the National Annenberg Election Survey didn't know President Bush alone favors allowing private investments of some Social Security money. Nearly as many didn't know that only Democratic candidate John Kerry proposes getting rid of tax breaks for the overseas profits of U.S. companies.

Importing drugs from Canada? That's a Kerry issue, but nearly half either didn't know or thought Bush also supported changing federal law to allow for drug imports from Canada.

Making abortions more difficult to obtain? Nearly one-third of those surveyed didn't know Bush alone supports more restrictions on abortion.

Eliminating the tax on estates? Two-thirds didn't know that's a Bush proposal.

After two years of presidential campaigning and hundreds of millions of dollars in political ads, many voters remained clueless about those and other policies, according to the survey.
Yahoo News article

Well, it doesn't matter if we're clueless - after all, great numbers of us still believe Iraq had WMD and was on the verge of annihilating us, and that Saddam was responsible for 9/11. We may be clueless, but we still know who we're gonna vote for.

Security report leaked

Less than four months before planned national elections in Iraq, attacks against U.S. troops, Iraqi security forces and private contractors number in the dozens each day and have spread to parts of the country that had been relatively peaceful, according to statistics compiled by [Kroll Security International,] a private security firm working for the U.S. government.

...Attacks over the past two weeks have killed more than 250 Iraqis and 29 U.S. military personnel, according to figures released by Iraq's Health Ministry and the Pentagon. A sampling of daily reports produced during that period by Kroll Security International for the U.S. Agency for International Development shows that such attacks typically number about 70 each day. In contrast, 40 to 50 hostile incidents occurred daily during the weeks preceding the handover of political authority to an interim Iraqi government on June 28, according to military officials.

...On maps included in the reports, red circles denoting attacks surround nearly every major city in central, western and northern Iraq, except for Kurdish-controlled areas in the far north. Cities in the Shiite Muslim-dominated south, including several that had undergone a period of relative calm in recent months, also have been hit with near-daily attacks.

...In number and scope, the attacks compiled in the Kroll reports suggest a broad and intensifying campaign of insurgent violence that contrasts sharply with assessments by Bush administration officials and Iraq's interim prime minister that the instability is contained to small pockets of the country.
WaPo article

I guess "assessments" is the euphemism du jour for lies.

The Kroll reports are based on nonclassified data provided by U.S.-led military forces, the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, private security companies working in Iraq and nongovernmental organizations. The reports, which Kroll has refused to distribute to journalists, were provided to The Post by a person on the list to receive them.

And we thank you, whoever you are.

After his speech to a joint meeting of Congress on Thursday, Allawi described Baghdad as "very good and safe." In fact, during the period for which security reports were available, the number of attacks in the capital averaged 22 a day.

On Wednesday, there were 28 separate hostile incidents in Baghdad, including five rocket-propelled grenade attacks, six roadside bombings and a suicide bombing in which a car exploded at a National Guard recruiting station, killing at least 11 people and wounding more than 50.

Very good. Very safe.

More attacks have been reported in the northern cities of Mosul, Samarra and Tikrit over the past two weeks than in Fallujah and Ramadi, two areas of frequent fighting in Anbar.

Military officials contend, however, that does not mean the restive areas west of Baghdad -- the area known as the Sunni Triangle -- are no longer insurgent strongholds. The likely explanation, the officials said, is that U.S. Marines stationed in Anbar have sharply reduced their patrolling, making them less vulnerable to roadside attacks.

Hmmmmmm....is there an extrapolation to be made there?

The security situation has grown so dire that many of the few remaining nongovernmental aid organizations left in Iraq are making plans to withdraw. The United Nations, which was supposed to help organize the national elections, has just 30 employees in the country, all of whom are quartered in the U.S.-controlled, fortified Green Zone.

... "When we leave home, we never know if we're going to return home alive or not," said Mohammed Kadhim, a taxi driver.

Very good. Very safe.

From the Trenches

Thanks to LaBelle for this excellent post of Mick Arran's From the Trenches (who, incidentally, experienced the same problems with Blogger - I thought maybe it was just me)....

I've been thinking about the "Ownership Society" for a few days and getting madder and madder at the intolerance, arrogance, and sheer brutality of it.

...I suppose I should be used to it by now: balancing the budget on our backs, scheming to take every possible advantage of us, the attitude from owners that they're such paragons of virtue we ought to be willing to work for them for nothing and consider it a privilege, the invisibility, the lack of respect, and the daily fight to get through another week. I should be but I'm not. I admit it: I'm not less angry in my old(er) age, I'm more angry.

...For 25 years I have watched our lives go from bad to worse to awful, experienced the shrinking of our presence in society from near-invisible to practically-invisible to "What? Are you still here? I thought you were dead." I have seen the gains we made with sweat and blood -literally - washed away in a sea of anti-labor rhetoric. Saddest of all, I have seen way too many of us buy into that rhetoric and sign on to a movement that we refuse to understand, despite all the signs and signals, is dedicated to our destruction.

......I was talking union at the shop one day a couple of years ago - which I used to do a lot, to the point where many ran when they saw me coming - and one of the guys said to me that he would never join a union because he'd be "stuck with it" forever....

...There's nothing wrong with dreaming. What was wrong was that he wasn't even rich yet and he already saw protecting workers as something separate from that dream and a barrier to it. He was a worker himself, yet he saw other workers as his natural enemies; a union was a bunch of them banding together to take away from him what he didn't even have yet, scheming what and how much they would steal as soon as he managed to acquire - something.

That's what makes Bush's sales pitch so powerful - and so dangerous. First they convinced us that we all want to be owners; then they convinced us that we all could be owners if we'd just stop wasting our time demanding frivolous luxuries like fair wages, affordable housing, and protection from the powerful. We, too, could be rich if we stood on our own two feet and stopped expecting the government to do "everything" for us. And now the're trying to convince us that society itself is based on "ownership"; that if we don't "own" something, we're not really Americans and we don't really count. So they, philanthropists that they are, are going to arrange it so we can "own" things, like debts and the responsibility to pay all the taxes corporations are ducking.

The invidiousness of this concept is almost beyond words.

Amen.

Read the whole post.

I've been saying now for a few years that this country needs a revival of unions - not the unions of today, but the unions of the day when unions clawed their bloody way into being - the days of Eugene Debs. It looks like Mick Arran, From the Trenches, is ready to revive them.

Bush and his corporate cronies are actually Molochite devotees, servants to the belief that Greed is the highest emotion, and the acquisition of "things" is the only measure of achievement. Moloch recognizes no human values, praises no human qualities, shows pity for no one and remorse for nothing. He is a single, simple force - he Takes. He is that in all of us that urges the virtues of unchecked selfishness whenever our generosity would have a price that would be hard to pay....

...Now I've identified the enemy. The enemy isn't Bush or Cheney or Ashcroft or Chao or Norquist or DeLay. The enemy is the shadowy figure behind and above all of them, the cold stone of a dead idol in which we've invested massive power because messy, chaotic, undisciplined Life scares us but doesn't move the stone.

All of which is an astoundingly long-winded way of saying that this site is going to stop assuming the war is metaphorical and start treating it like it's a real shooting war - which it is. Thus Dispatch From the Trenches - messages from and for The Front where the battles are being fought and the troops are doing the dying.

...I think hope (remember "hope"?) is a function of the belief that things can change for the better, but also the result of active resistance to and rejection of anything and anyone who tries to take that hope away by closing off options and rigidly defining what's an "acceptable" response. Anger is a key part of that half of Hope. You need focused anger to resist and resist and resist again.


Welcome to the Resistance.

Anyway, they were "just guessing"

WASHINGTON, Sept. 27 - The same intelligence unit that produced a gloomy report in July about the prospect of growing instability in Iraq warned the Bush administration about the potential costly consequences of an American-led invasion two months before the war began, government officials said Monday.

The estimate came in two classified reports prepared for President Bush in January 2003 by the National Intelligence Council, an independent group that advises the director of central intelligence. The assessments predicted that an American-led invasion of Iraq would increase support for political Islam and would result in a deeply divided Iraqi society prone to violent internal conflict.

  article

Yes, but he doesn't read.

One of the reports also warned of a possible insurgency against the new Iraqi government or American-led forces, saying that rogue elements from Saddam Hussein's government could work with existing terrorist groups or act independently to wage guerrilla warfare, the officials said. The assessments also said a war would increase sympathy across the Islamic world for some terrorist objectives.

And he doesn't listen, either.

President Bush has acknowledged a "miscalculation'' about the virulency of the insurgency that would rise against the American occupation, though he insisted that it was simply an outgrowth of the speed of the initial military victory in 2003.

Huh?

Remember that when it takes us much longer in Iran and Syria to claim "Mission Accomplished!"

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Terrorists have no regard for innocent Iraqi lives

"While maintaining security is a primary concern, we are also very concerned about minimizing collateral damage and putting the innocent residents of eastern Baghdad at risk," [ Lt. Col. Jim Hutton] said. "The enemy shows no concern for the Iraqi people." source

An exclusive report from Knight Ridder's Washington Bureau, which has gained much renown for war-related scoops in the past year, revealed Saturday that U.S. and multinational forces and Iraqi police are killing twice as many Iraqis, most of them civilians, as attacks by insurgents. The statistics were compiled by the Iraqi Health Ministry and obtained exclusively by Knight Ridder. Iraqi officials said about two-thirds of the Iraqi deaths were caused by the U.S. side and police; the remaining third died from insurgent attacks. source

Pentagon Papers


Click graphic

Jay prompts me to offer up this Daniel Ellsberg interview (click the graphic). Good timing, I think. I've linked it permanently on my webpage here with a couple other Ellsberg articles specifically relating to the present situation.

Ellsberg, labeled a traitor by many, is a true American hero. As a young man, he risked everything, including his freedom, to tell the truth to the American public. Those were the days when heroes still existed. We could have chosen to take our country in a different direction back then. Ellsberg gave us the opportunity. We turned him down.

The debate

For a supposedly impromptu debate, this one has already been almost totally scripted. The two sides have dickered over just about everything--a rule preventing candidates from quizzing each other directly, the height of the podiums, you name it. When President Bush and Sen. John Kerry walk onto the stage at the University of Miami in Coral Gables on Thursday, they will even know what kind of pen and notepad they can use. The scripted cordiality even extends as far as the opening-bell handshake.
  Iraq Net article

Ah, yes. The important stuff. While the rest of the world grapples with the reality and the enormity of our insane and inhumane foreign policy, these two asshats are dickering over who looks the tallest.

Below the surface, there are actually many similarities in the candidates' worldviews. "Kerry and Bush really buy into a larger consensus about what America's role in the world should be and what the implication and meaning of 9/11 was," says [ Boston University foreign policy Prof. Andrew] Bacevich. It quickly becomes less of a debate about where America should go than how it should get there. "

See you back at home, Dr. John Mack

BOSTON (AP) - Dr. John E. Mack, the Harvard Medical School professor of psychiatry...has died.

Mack was struck and killed by an alleged drunken driver in London on Monday while attending the T.E. Lawrence Society Symposium in Oxford, England, according to a release on the John E. Mack Institute Web site. He was 74.

...Mack was born in New York City. He earned an undergraduate degree from Oberlin College in 1951 and his medical degree from Harvard Medical School in 1955. He served in the U.S. Air Force from 1959-61.

...Mack's early work focused on clinical explorations of dreams, nightmares and teen suicide and how world perception affects relationships. He advocated a move away from materialism in Western culture, blaming it for the Cold War and global ecological problems. --AP
source

"He was a restless, highly creative man who was many-sided," said Robert Jay Lifton, the psychiatrist and author, who was a longtime friend of Dr. Mack's. They worked together in the antinuclear movement, a longstanding concern of Dr. Mack's, and in the application of psychological approaches to the study of history.

"He was as sensitive to others' needs as anyone I've known," Lifton said in a telephone interview from his Cape Cod home.

A Cambridge resident, Dr. Mack founded the psychiatric department of Cambridge Hospital. He was certified as a practitioner of both child and adult psychoanalysis. His early research interests in psychology included dreams, nightmares, and teenage suicide.

...In 1983, he founded the Center for Psychology and Social Change, which this year became the Mack Center. He published about 150 scholarly articles. Among the 11 books he wrote or collaborated on are "Nightmares and Human Conflict" (1970) and, with Holly Hickler, "Vivienne: The Life and Suicide of an Adolescent Girl" (1981).

...In 1990, Dr. Mack began his research on people who say they have encountered extraterrestrials. He held that such encounters were real, though probably more spiritual than physical in character. His work drew widespread attention in 1994 with the publication of a best-selling book, "Abduction."

That year, Harvard Medical School appointed a special faculty committee to review Dr. Mack's clinical care and clinical investigation of his subjects. After a 15-month process, the committee declined to take any action against him.

Dr. Mack eventually interviewed some 200 individuals who said they had encounters with extraterrestrials. Although he was subjected to widespread ridicule because of his work, Dr. Mack saw it as a unique opportunity to study spiritual or transformational experience, a theme that ran through much of his earlier work.

...He published another book on the subject, "Cosmos: Human Transformation and Alien Encounters," in 1999.

..."No one has been able to come up with a counter-formulation that explains what's going on," Dr. Mack said in a 1992 Globe interview in which he discussed his view of alien encounters. "But if people can't be convinced that this is real, that's OK. All I want is for people to be convinced that there's something going on here that is not explainable."


Photo from Boston.com

Namaste.

Tuesday, September 28, 2004

What a surprise

Links have been discovered between senior American military officials and the failed coup plot in Equatorial Guinea that has left Sir Mark Thatcher facing trial in South Africa.
Guardian article

Didn't see that one coming, did we?

Theresa Whelan, a member of the Bush administration in charge of African affairs at the Pentagon, twice met a London-based businessman, Greg Wales, in Washington before the coup attempt. Mr Wales has been accused of being one of its organisers, but has denied any involvement.

...The regime of President Teodoro Obiang Nguema in...Equatorial Guinea has accused the US of backing the plot, but the Pentagon denies supporting it. US officials say it was Mr Wales who made all the approaches to them.

Didn't see that coming either, did we?

"Contractors are here to stay in supporting US national security objectives overseas," [said Ms. Whelan]. They were cheaper, and saved the use of US forces in peacekeeping and training.

...She added: "The US can be supportive in trying to ameliorate regional crises without necessarily having to put US troops on the ground, which is often a very difficult political decision. Sometimes we may not want to be very visible."...

The Obiang regime has complained that the US did not warn it of the coup plot, although it received intelligence from South Africa.

The February 19 plan is said to have been aborted after a hired aircraft broke down. The plotters then acquired an old former US Air National Guard Boeing, built to a military specification, that was flown over from Kansas with a crew from Florida for a second coup attempt. But the seller, the US firm Dodson Aviation, says there was no US government involvement in the deal.

Both the US and Britain have extensive oil interests in Equatorial Guinea which, in the words of one US official, is "the new Kuwait".

Now that surprises you, huh?

Yawn

North Korea says it has turned the plutonium from 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods into nuclear weapons to serve as a deterrent against increasing U.S. nuclear threats and to prevent a nuclear war in northeast Asia.

Warning that the danger of war on the Korean peninsula "is snowballing," Vice Foreign Minister Choe Su Hon provided details Monday of the nuclear deterrent that he said North Korea has developed for self-defense.

He told the U.N. General Assembly's annual ministerial meeting that Pyongyang had "no other option but to possess a nuclear deterrent" because of U.S. policies that he claimed were designed to "eliminate" North Korea and make it "a target of preemptive nuclear strikes.''

...South Korean Deputy Foreign Minister Lee Soo-hyuck said in late April that it was estimated that eight nuclear bombs could be made if all 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods were reprocessed. Before the reprocessing, South Korea said it believed the North had enough nuclear material to build one or two nuclear bombs.

The State Department official said he hadn't seen Choe's comments but noted that the Bush administration has long believed that North Korea has at least one or two nuclear weapons. The official, asking not to be identified, said the North Koreans also have made a number of conflicting statements about how far along their weapons development programs have come.

AP

"Showing none of the alarm about the North's growing arsenal that he once voiced regularly about Iraq," said the daily, Mr Bush "opened his palms and shrugged" when asked about intelligence reports indicating that North Korea may now have the fuel to produce six or eight nuclear weapons.
Dawn article

I always said we might have to resort to bringing him back

Maybe we don't. He'll do it the democratic way.

Overthrown Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, who was arrested by US forces last December, reportedly plans to run as a candidate in the Iraqi elections scheduled for January 2005.

Saddam's lawyer Giovanni di Stefano told Denmark's B.T. newspaper that Saddam decided during one of their discussions that he would declare his candidacy for the elections.

Stefano said that there was no law that prevented Saddam from appearing on the ballot. He added that Saddam hopes to regain his presidency and palaces via the democratic process.

...Stefano remarked that a recent Gallup poll indicates that 42 percent of the Iraqi people want their former leader back.

Zaman article

Wouldn't that be a hoot? Saddam using the democractic process right out from under us while we're trying to buy the election. Ah, life's little twists.

I always said we might have to resort to bringing him back

Maybe we don't. He'll do it the democratic way.

Overthrown Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, who was arrested by US forces last December, reportedly plans to run as a candidate in the Iraqi elections scheduled for January 2005.

Saddam's lawyer Giovanni di Stefano told Denmark's B.T. newspaper that Saddam decided during one of their discussions that he would declare his candidacy for the elections.

Stefano said that there was no law that prevented Saddam from appearing on the ballot. He added that Saddam hopes to regain his presidency and palaces via the democratic process.

...Stefano remarked that a recent Gallup poll indicates that 42 percent of the Iraqi people want their former leader back.

Zaman article


Wouldn't that be a hoot? Saddam using the democractic process right out from under us while we're trying to buy the election. Ah, life's little twists.

If anybody cares

The insistence by interim Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad Allawi and many U.S. officials that foreign fighters are streaming into Iraq to battle American troops runs counter to the U.S. military's own assessment that the Iraqi insurgency remains primarily a home-grown problem.

In a U.S. visit last week, Allawi spoke of foreign insurgents "flooding" his country, and both President Bush and his Democratic challenger, Massachusetts Sen. John F. Kerry, have cited these fighters as a major security problem.

But according to top U.S. military officers in Iraq, the threat posed by foreign fighters is far less significant than American and Iraqi politicians portray. Instead, commanders said, loyalists of Saddam Hussein's regime — who have swelled their ranks in recent months as ordinary Iraqis bristle at the U.S. military presence in Iraq — represent the far greater threat to the country's fragile 3-month-old government.

...U.S. military officials said the core of the insurgency in Iraq was — and always had been — Hussein's fiercest loyalists, who melted into Iraq's urban landscape when the war began in March 2003. During the succeeding months, they say, the insurgents' ranks have been bolstered by Iraqis who grew disillusioned with the U.S. failure to deliver basic services, jobs and reconstruction projects.

It is this expanding group, they say, that has given the insurgency its deadly power and which represents the biggest challenge to an Iraqi government trying to establish legitimacy countrywide.

"People try to turn this into the mujahedin, jihad war. It's not that," said one U.S. intelligence official. "How many foreign fighters have been captured and processed? Very few."

...U.S. military officials said Iraqi officials tended to exaggerate the number of foreign fighters in Iraq to obscure the fact that large numbers of their countrymen have taken up arms against U.S. troops and the American-backed interim Iraqi government.

Yahoo article

Yes, and American polticians and media parrot it to you so that you'll think there's some hope of getting the situation under control. And so you'll think we're there to liberate the Iraqi people. Ha! Because you'll believe anything.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Supremely Courted

If you have any faith left in the separation of powers, you will have that faith dislodged by this article in Vanity Fair (Part I - pdf) (Part II - pdf), which Digby at Hullabaloo links and discusses today, claiming:

Even after the impeachment sideshow, an event that solidified my belief in the lethal, fascistic nature of the modern Republican party, I was not fully prepared for the no holds barred approach they would take in this situation.

It is what led me to the point at which I am able to say without any sense of restraint or caution that I would put NOTHING past them --- even a staged terrorist attack. This is because every time I think they have some limits, they prove me wrong. As the old saying goes, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice...won't get fooled again....

Gore and his team knew that the Republicans would fight with everything they had, but they still maintained some faith in the legal system to require basic fairness in something this important. And, even the most cynical of us thought that the egos of the Supreme Court justices would never allow them to make a purely partisan decision because history would remember them as whores.

If I had any political idealism left it died on the day that Antonin Scalia stopped judges from counting votes in Florida.

This article shows that fix was in from the beginning.

--Digby

I absolutely agree that at some point, anyone with eyes open will no longer be able to maintain the delusion that even the most rabid politicians would have scruples enough not to stage a terrorist attack murdering their own citizens. Read some history books. Not the ones they provide in public schools. The truth is simply that you would be wise to realize there is NOTHING these people won't do to maintain power.

Greg Palast did a great investigative job back when the 2000 vote fraud happened, but nobody in the U.S. would publish his work. If you want to read the original exposé of this American coup d'etat, get his book The Best Democracy Money Can Buy. As a plus, Palast's writing is entertaining and easy to comprehend.


Click graphic

Lots of good Palast articles about the coup are available on his website here.

Read the Vanity Fair article, if you can. It's a long read, and the .pdf files are copies of the actual magazine pages, so it's not the easiest thing to read (easier if you print it off). Also, the last bit of the conclusion is cut off (and I couldn't find a copy of it). Still, the information provided is good. It runs down the entire fiasco, concentrating on the Supreme Court's involvement and the repression of the black vote, and provides information that never made it to the light of day when the coup was going down. It also gives fair warning for what you might expect in November. It certainly won't be any more scrupulous. Nor legal.

Technical difficulties

I just blog. I don't do Windows.

I try to look at my formatting in Mozilla, I.E., and sometimes Netscape, but I don't understand all of the tricks of formatting (or even most of them), so I can't figure out why some browser and terminal combinations render the view one way and others another. Why the hell don't they just standardize this stuff? (Okay, I know why - Microsoft couldn't monopolize the market.) I know that if I forget to limit the size of a large graphic, it will throw off the formatting, and you'll play hell trying to read the blog. I just don't know how to code them so that they "float" with the size of the columns, and the blog view stays narrower than your full screen but floats with the size of your terminal. Some things are controlled by tblog, and some I can change. I also don't know why the IE browser doesn't render the background gold the same as the post heading gold, when I have them coded with the same number. Go figger. Of course, with my latest adjustment, you shouldn't be able to see the background gold at all (unless it's just a strip at the top of the screen - and I can't figure out why some browsers render it with that strip and some don't).

I spent hours this past weekend trying to code some pages on my website to have a "frozen" sidebar with links while you scroll the main column of the page. It worked beautifully in Mozilla, but I.E. wouldn't play along. I found a website that offers tips and gave a line of code that was supposed to make it work in I.E., but it just wouldn't. At least not on my computer.

Anyway, I apologize for all the format changing as I try to get it working as best I can. Mostly, I have to make sure Rich can read it on his computer, as Rich is probably the person who reads YWA the most faithfully and the most often. You do understand that I have to keep Rich happy, don't you?

Update 1:00pm: LaBelle takes exception. With good reason. It may be that Rich does not read YWA more often or more faithfully than she. And she does provide invaluable feedback on typos and other errors. Without pay, even!

Oh my. I may not do Windows, but I do dig holes.

Powell may have to shut up sooner than later

The al-Qaida network has been decimated at top levels since bin Laden last appeared on television three years ago, Powell said. He said that bin Laden "is not showing himself in a way that he can be captured."
article

Dear Mr. bin Laden, Please come out and show yourself. Otherwise, we can't get you.

There. I think that will work.

"It does have the capacity to regenerate itself," Powell said of al-Qaida. But any future leaders are not as accomplished nor as experienced as "those who have been taken out" in the U.S. campaign that overthrew the Taliban regime in Afghanistan and the subsequent hunt for al-Qaida operatives, Powell said in an Associated Press interview.

Honestly. Get off the Ambien, Colin. Any "future" leaders will gain experience as time passes. Any future American Generals are not as accomplished or experienced as the dead ones, either.

"I don't know where he is," Powell said. "I don't know his state of health. I believe he is still alive, but I can't prove that. He clearly is in hiding and he is on the run."

No, I'm serious, Colin. Get off the drugs. "I can't prove he's alive, but he's clearly in hiding and on the run. Clearly that's the situation. I don't know where he is, because he won't come out and show himself. But clearly, he's on the run."

US Secretary of State Colin Powell has said that Washington continues to remain clueless about the whereabouts of Al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden, especially in the Tora Bora Hills of Afghanistan.
article

But clearly, he is in hiding and on the run. And what's the point in hunting for him if he won't pop up and show himself?

Washington continues to remain clueless, period.

Help Wanted

Apply to the FBI.

More than 120,000 hours of potentially valuable terrorism-related recordings have not yet been translated by linguists at the FBI, according to a Justice Department investigation.

The report, by the department's inspector-general, found the FBI still did not have the capacity to translate all the terrorism-related material from wiretaps and other intelligence sources, and that the influx of new material had outpaced the bureau's resources.

The report comes as officials in the Bush Administration raise concerns about a terrorist attack before the November 2 presidential elections and as new intelligence indicates that Osama bin Laden is still alive and most likely hiding with other senior al-Qaeda leaders in Pakistan.

The Age article

Nice going Bushman. Keeping America safe. Bring 'em on. Who cares we can't even keep up with the ones we already had to worry about?

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Stand firm

I don't like Kerry, but the whole business about "staying the course" is beyond ridiculous. There's a story about some politician who was chided for always changing his mind and who responded something to the effect, "When the facts change, I adjust my position. What do you do, sir?"

Precision airstrikes

I've been posting about Falluja and Baghdad, but of course they are not the only cities we are destroying in Iraq. Here's an account from Juan Cole on Najaf:

Ash-Sharq al-Awsat reports from Kuwaiti sources that the destruction visted on Najaf by the US assault on the Sadrists in August is far more extensive than usually realized. Ali al-Mu'min, who is with a humanitarian organization, said that ordinary activities were still at a standstill in Najaf, which seemed substantially depopulated, and that vast swathes of its buildings and homes had been destroyed.

The report is supported by the following email I received from Europe:

. . The Najafi guy living at my house got a phone call from Najaf on Saturday. Hotel Nejef and Hotel "Imam Ali" (newly built in 2002) were flattened by American cruise missiles during these last Sadrist months. Sadrist snipers were said to be the reason . . . Rajul Street, B's childhood "hood" is rubble. Old, culturally, historically valuable buildings and surroundings like bazaar environment areas, several hundred years old, are rubble and dust.

The Valley of Peace, this huge churchyard is littered with cluster bomb cans - unexploded. Someone should dig in to that fact.

CIA in Iraq elections

Like they aren't in elections everywhere. This was a no-brainer.

Time Magazine reports that the Bush administration had had a plan to use the Central Intelligence Agency to funnel money to candidates it favored in the forthcoming Iraqi elections. The rationale given was that Iran was bankrolling its own candidates.

In other countries we call it funding democracy, via the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). I guess they're not as concerned about whitewashing anything in Iraq. After all, that's a front in the WAR. ON. TERROR! Surely you can see the need to intervene in whatever way necessary to bring democracy to Iraq.

This plan was apparently derailed in part by the intervention of Democratic Minority Leader in the House, Nancy Pelosi, who remonstrated with National Security Adviser Condaleeza Rice about it.

I'm hearing more and more about Nancy Pelosi that I like. She sounds like a woman with scruples and no fear. Stay out of small planes, Nancy.

This comes from Juan Cole today. You should definitely read his commentary.

And, for whatever reason, Cole has thrown in this tidbit:

So, the "cover story" of forestalling "Iranian influence" doesn't hold water. Bush just wanted to buy himself an election, in the Bush tradition. (Bush's grandfather Prescott, a US senator, probably made much of the pile on which he ran by investing in Nazi companies).

Perhaps because it is newly run at the Guardian under the title: "How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power". If that story interests you, here's another: Bush-Nazi Link Confirmed.

No Mercy for Falluja

At least four people have been killed in the latest US onslaught on the Iraqi city of Falluja overnight.

Ten others were injured on Tuesday as US warplanes again bombed Falluja, targeting the area of al-Askari and the industrial neighbourhoods near the main highway east of the city, Iraqi journalist Husain al-Shammari told Aljazeera.

The US military said it had "conducted a precision strike", destroying a building believed to be the hideout for followers of al-Qaida-linked Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

The army has been at pains to discredit consistent reports from doctors and residents that women and children have been killed or wounded in repeated air strikes on Falluja in the recent weeks.Aljazeera article

Who are you going to believe? The U.S. Army or your lying eyes?

Meanwhile, fresh strikes have been launched on the Baghdad suburb of Sadr City overnight. On Monday, up to five people were killed and 46 wounded when US warplanes bombed parts of the suburb.

I'm all out of commentary about the genocide.

It continues.

All Falluja posts.

Monday, September 27, 2004

KFAR shutdown update

I published a post recently about a Knoxville radio station being raided by the FCC. Some additional information has crossed my e-desk today. VHeadline has published an apology for misrepresenting the event, and clarifies that KFAR is a pirate station, broadcasting without a license.

Bush got it wrong

Again.

Bob quotes Riverbend, a blogger in Baghdad.

You know things are really going downhill in Iraq, when the Bush speech-writers have to recycle his old speeches. Listening to him yesterday, one might think he was simply copying and pasting bits and pieces from the older stuff. My favorite part was when he claimed, "Electricity has been restored above pre-war levels..." Even E. had to laugh at that one. A few days ago, most of Baghdad was in the dark for over 24 hours and lately, on our better days, we get about 12 hours of electricity. Bush got it wrong (or Allawi explained it to incorrectly)- the electricity is drastically less than pre-war levels, but the electricity BILL is way above pre-war levels. Congratulations Iraqis on THAT!! Our electricity bill was painful last month. Before the war, Iraqis might pay an average of around 5,000 Iraqi Dinars a month for electricity (the equivalent back then of $2.50) - summer or winter. Now, it's quite common to get bills above 70,000 Iraqi Dinars... for half-time electricity.

Roverer smear tactics

Josh Marshall comments on an Atlantic Monthly article this week that quotes from past Rove staffers. Excerpt:

[Judge] Kennedy had spent years on the bench as a juvenile and family-court judge, during which time he had developed a strong interest in aiding abused children. In the early 1980s he had helped to start the Children's Trust Fund of Alabama, and he later established the Corporate Foundation for Children, a private, nonprofit organization. At the time of the race he had just served a term as president of the National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse and Neglect. One of Rove's signature tactics is to attack an opponent on the very front that seems unassailable. Kennedy was no exception.

Some of Kennedy's campaign commercials touted his volunteer work, including one that showed him holding hands with children. "We were trying to counter the positives from that ad," a former Rove staffer told me, explaining that some within the See camp initiated a whisper campaign that Kennedy was a pedophile.

..."What Rove does," says Joe Perkins, "is try to make something so bad for a family that the candidate will not subject the family to the hardship. Mark is not your typical Alabama macho, beer-drinkin', tobacco-chewin', pickup-drivin' kind of guy. He is a small, well-groomed, well-educated family man, and what they tried to do was make him look like a homosexual pedophile. That was really, really hard to take."

LaBelle pegged Rove right the other day when she said he is like a creepy murder novel villain. More on Mr. Roverer is on my webpage here.

Presidential Auction 2004

During a question and answer session, a young man demanded to know why Kerry voted to give Bush authority to attack Iraq but voted against an $87 billion appropriation bill to support the war effort there.

"Is that the kind of thing he would do as president?," the man asked.

Heinz Kerry sharply asked the man whether he had read the legislation that was voted on.

When he said no, she told him that Kerry had supported $60 billion in military appropriations for Iraq, but would not vote for the full $87 billion because he considered it a "blank check." Kerry was one of 11 Democrats to vote against the bill.

"And we knew they'd already given Haliburton millions in no-bid contracts," she snapped, referring to the company formerly led by Vice President Dick Cheney.

"If you want to say (Kerry) flip-flopped, just say so, don't try to hide," Heinz Kerry scolded.

The Denver Channel article

Maybe Teresa should stand in for John in the debates.

Jimmy takes on Jeb & Junior

The Carter Center often oversees elections in foreign countries where fairness is a question, with the Venezuelan recall referendum being one of its latest well-publicized missions. Some Democrats have asked for the Center's services in November in this country, prompting a good deal of huffy outrage. Jimmy decided not to hold his breath waiting for the official invitation, I guess.

[S]ome basic international requirements for a fair election are missing in Florida.

The most significant of these requirements are:

• A nonpartisan electoral commission or a trusted and nonpartisan official who will be responsible for organizing and conducting the electoral process before, during and after the actual voting takes place...

• Uniformity in voting procedures, so that all citizens, regardless of their social or financial status, have equal assurance that their votes are cast in the same way and will be tabulated with equal accuracy...

It was obvious that in 2000 these basic standards were not met in Florida, and there are disturbing signs that once again, as we prepare for a presidential election, some of the state's leading officials hold strong political biases that prevent necessary reforms.

...Four years ago, the top election official, Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris, was also the co-chair of the Bush-Cheney state campaign committee. The same strong bias has become evident in her successor, Glenda Hood, who was a highly partisan elector for George W. Bush in 2000. Several thousand ballots of African Americans were thrown out on technicalities in 2000, and a fumbling attempt has been made recently to disqualify 22,000 African Americans (likely Democrats), but only 61 Hispanics (likely Republicans), as alleged felons.

...Florida's governor, Jeb Bush, naturally a strong supporter of his brother, has taken no steps to correct these departures from principles of fair and equal treatment or to prevent them in the future.

It is unconscionable to perpetuate fraudulent or biased electoral practices in any nation. It is especially objectionable among us Americans, who have prided ourselves on setting a global example for pure democracy.

WaPo article

As they say, stay out of small airplanes, Jimbo.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Novak claims CIA and White House are at war

We can only hope.

Paul R. Pillar, the CIA's national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia, sat down Tuesday night in a large West Coast city with a select group of private citizens. He was not talking off the cuff. Relying on a multi-paged, single-spaced memorandum, Pillar said he and his colleagues concluded early in the Bush administration that military intervention in Iraq would intensify anti-American hostility throughout Islam. This was not from a CIA retiree but an active senior official.

...For President Bush to publicly write off a CIA paper as just guessing is without precedent. For the agency to go semi-public is not only unprecedented but shocking. George Tenet's retirement as director of Central Intelligence removed the buffer between president and agency.

Chicago Sun Times article

And probably why Porter Goss, reputed Bush Brownie, was appointed.

Through most of the Bush administration, the CIA high command has been engaged in a bitter struggle with the Pentagon. CIA officials refer to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Undersecretary Douglas Feith as ''ideologues.'' Nevertheless, it is clear the CIA's wrath has now extended to the White House. Bush reduced the tensions a little on Thursday, this time in a joint Washington press conference with Allawi, by saying his use of the word "guess" was "unfortunate."

Of course something "unfortunate" comes out of his trap every time he opens it.

The CIA is...supposed to be a resource -- not a critic -- for the president.

And this may be the first president not to make use of it.

Modern history is filled with intelligence bureaus turning against their own governments, for good or ill. In the final days of World War II, the German Abwehr conspired against Hitler.

Your Freudian slippage is showing, Boob. If Krugman made that statement, he'd have to hire body guards.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

A picture is worth...


Seen at Shrillblog.

Oh my.

Keystone Cops

[The Transportation Safety Administration] recently acknowledged that a Federal Air Marshall, unable to fly for weeks when his name was mistakenly put on the "no-fly" list, was in fact not a threat, and removed his name from the list.
article

Thanks to Under the Same Sun for catching that.

Who'd a thunk it?

Well, actually, I guess Jefferson thought it...

[T]he spirit of the times may alter, will alter. Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless. A single zealot may commence persecutor, and better men be his victims. It can never be too often repeated, that the time for fixing every essential right on a legal basis is while our rulers are honest, and ourselves united. From the conclusion of this war we shall be going down hill. It will not then be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support. They will be forgotten, therefore, and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves, but in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the conclusion of this war, will remain on us long, will be made heavier and heavier, till our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion.

Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia - 1784


Thanks to a federal appeals court, maybe Floridians' constitutional rights will stand a chance.

A federal appeals court on Monday revived a lawsuit seeking a paper trail for Florida's new touchscreen voting machines with only five weeks left before the presidential election.

The court told a federal judge to reopen the case affecting the 15 Florida counties that use voting machines that don't create paper copies.

Three judges from the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals wrote that the judge improperly decided not to get involved in the lawsuit filed by Rep. Robert Wexler, a Florida Democrat.

A state appeals court ruled last month that a paper trail of ballots was not required, ruling that voters are not guaranteed "a perfect voting system."
Yahoo News article

What?!

And the whole country of Iraq doesn't need to vote, either. Boy, oh boy, democracy sure has changed since I was a kid.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Billmon at large

Apparently, he's not dead, although Whiskey Bar has been lifeless for some time. This LA Times article yesterday about blogging, written by Billmon, has a byline attributed to him with his Whiskey Bar address, so maybe he'll get back to posting there now that the Times article is online.
[T]he media's infatuation has a distinct odor of the deathbed about it — not for the blogosphere, which has a commercially bright future, but for the idea of blogging as a grass-roots challenge to the increasingly sanitized "content" peddled by the Time Warner-Capital Cities-Disney-General Electric-Viacom-Tribune media oligopoly.

...I've watched the commercialization of this culture of dissent with growing unease. When I recently decided to take a long break from blogging, it was for a mix of personal and philosophical reasons. But the direction the blogosphere is going makes me wonder whether I'll ever go back.

...Even as it collectively achieves celebrity status for its anti-establishment views, blogging is already being domesticated by its success. What began as a spontaneous eruption of populist creativity is on the verge of being absorbed by the media-industrial complex it claims to despise.

In the process, a charmed circle of bloggers — those glib enough and ideologically safe enough to fit within the conventional media punditocracy — is gaining larger audiences and greater influence. But the passion and energy that made blogging such a potent alternative to the corporate-owned media are in danger of being lost, or driven back to the outer fringes of the Internet.

Even as I type....the Whiskey Bar is open - no comment yet, only a graphic. Maybe he won't go back. That will be our loss. I understand getting tired, moving on, that sort of thing. I don't understand being unhappy about the state of the blogosphere and quitting because of that. Or maybe I do. Maybe that's the same way I feel about the United States of America these days. In that case, I would conclude that Billmon has accepted his own identity as a blogger to be defined by the blogosphere. I don't think that's necessary. So, Billmon, here's my advice: if you like to write and the blogging style allows you to write as you wish, get back to the blog. There's nothing wrong with being on the outer fringes of anything. It's where the best people hang out.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

One simple question

Honestly, I didn't think the One Simple Question was really worthy of being funded, but hey, maybe I just don't get it. At any rate, I did post the website link a while back, and the Rude Pundit has recently challenged people to come up with the one big hitting question that would throw the Asshat into a tailspin (Bob had some great ideas) in response to this One Simple Question website, so I'll keep the ball rolling....Check out this email I got today from the web author:

Thanks very much for linking to One Simple Question: Over two hundred bloggers posted entries about The Question!

I'm writing to you today to ask you unite on Monday by posting a fresh link to great news. Today, the "Bush Bounty" increased by $6000!

That's right: In addition to the now $2300 reward now offered by The World's Shortest Blog, an anonymous sponsor has stepped up to offer an additional $6000 if the question is televised and answered! That's a potential $8300 payoff!

Thanks to this new "Answer Bounty" -- we have one chance to make this One Simple Question newsworthy.

Please join in linking to The World's Shortest Blog and the $6000 Answer Bounty tomorrow, Monday, Sept. 26.

If everyone links on one day, we may propel The Question to the #1 on Blogdex -- and conceivably earn attention in the mainstream media. This is something that right-wingers coordinate very well; conservatives trumpet in unison very effectively. But thanks to your previous support for One Simple Question, we have over two hundred left-leaning bloggers who can join together in one voice -- right now, when it's needed most.

We have the power to beat the right at their own game.

Please help! We can make the question mainstream by standing united on Monday!

Thanks to all... Let's Boot Bush!

John

I hate to be materialistic, but I wish I had an anonymous sponsor with $6,000 to blow on (arguably) trivial matters.

Anyway, there's your challenge and your chance to make $8300 (or more by the time you get the question asked and answered). Go to it.

...but hey, do what you want...you will anyway.

Because you'll believe anything - Part whatever

It's not what he did....it's that he lied about it. That's what was so objectionable about Clinton, wasn't it?

Many of President George W. Bush's assertions about progress in Iraq -- from police training and reconstruction to preparations for January elections -- are in dispute, according to internal Pentagon documents, lawmakers and key congressional aides on Sunday.
  Swiss Info article

"In dispute" must be the new euphemism for lies.

Bush touted preparations for national elections in January, saying Iraq's electoral commission is up and running and told Americans on Saturday that "United Nations electoral advisers are on the ground in Iraq."

... "The framework for it (free and fair elections) hasn't even been set up. The voter registration lists aren't set. There have to be hundreds of polling places, hundreds of trained monitors and poll watchers. None of that has happened," Madeleine Albright, former Secretary of State for President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, told ABC's "This Week."

He said nearly 100,000 "fully trained and equipped" Iraqi soldiers, police officers and other security personnel are already at work, and that would rise to 125,000 by the end of this year.

...[Pentagon] documents show that of the nearly 90,000 currently in the police force, only 8,169 have had the full eight-week academy training. Another 46,176 are listed as "untrained," and it will be July 2006 before the administration reaches its new goal of a 135,000-strong, fully trained police force.

Six Army battalions have had "initial training," while 57 National Guard battalions, 896 soldiers in each, are still being recruited or "awaiting equipment." Just eight Guard battalions have reached "initial (operating) capability," and the Pentagon acknowledged the Guard's performance has been "uneven."

Training has yet to begin for the 4,800-man civil intervention force, which will help counter a deadly insurgency. And none of the 18,000 border enforcement guards have received any centralised training to date, despite earlier claims they had, according to Democrats on the U.S. House of Representatives Appropriations Committee.

They estimated that 22,700 Iraqi personnel have received enough basic training to make them "minimally effective at their tasks," in contrast to the 100,000 figure cited by Bush.

... The White House defended its figures, and a senior administration official defined "fully trained" as having gone through "initial basic operations training."

It all depends on what your meaning of "fully trained" is.

[emphasis mine]

Concern for innocents

"While maintaining security is a primary concern, we are also very concerned about minimizing collateral damage and putting the innocent residents of eastern Baghdad at risk," [ Lt. Col. Jim Hutton] said. "The enemy shows no concern for the Iraqi people."
Yahoo News article

U.S. jets pounded suspected Shiite militant positions in the Baghdad slum of Sadr City on Monday, killing at least five people and wounding 46....


Residents said explosions lit up the night sky for hours before dawn. Mangled vehicles, debris and shards of glass littered the streets.


Dr. Qassem Saddam of the Imam Ali hospital in Sadr City said five people were killed and 40 were wounded — including 15 women and nine children. source

US warplanes bombed Fallujah again on Sunday, more than once, attempting to strike at a meeting of Monotheism and Holy War downtown. The US struck three times in 24 hours. Hospital officials said they received 8 dead and 22 wounded, including women and children. Residents asserted that many victims remained buried under the rubble. source

Arming terrorists

Tom sends this link to the Denver Post's front page.

Lax oversight of weapons exports opens the door for adversaries to get their hands on lethal missiles, assault guns and components for larger weapons systems, sources say.

Homeland Security agents recently have uncovered plots to divert night-vision lenses to Iran, fighter-jet parts to China, grenade launchers to Colombian guerrillas, nuclear triggers to Pakistan, and more.

And despite internal warnings, government-sanctioned sales worth more than $10 billion a year continue spreading more weapons worldwide.

... Tens of thousands of arms deals aren't fully reviewed, nor are weapons inspected abroad as required under the U.S. Arms Control Export Act to prevent diversion or misuse.

When government officials do review arms deals, they find increasing problems - including diversions to at least one criminal and several hostile nations. Nearly one in five arms deals checked last year - 76 out of 413 - had such problems.

...Consider the case of Stinger shoulder-launched missiles - which the United States supplies to at least 17 countries, including Egypt, Israel, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. Experts agree that if any U.S. weapon must be controlled, this is it.

... The Defense Department office responsible "does not know how many Stingers have been sold overseas," it said. "Records on the number and destination of Stingers sold overseas are incomplete, unreliable and largely in hard-copy form."

...A Defense Department spokesman, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the Army has sent out 237 this year and is in the process of sending 249 more. He declined to say where.

...Today, more and more countries - from booming East Asia to the volatile Middle East - are seeking advanced items for their arsenals.

And the United States is by far the world's leading arms supplier, with annual industry sales topping $300 million and government sales topping $13 billion last year - a figure expected to reach $13.8 billion this year, government data show.

In Colorado, some 300 companies are registered to export military technology - mostly dual-use items that have commercial as well as military uses. The State Department lists 4,000 companies nationwide. Names are kept secret.

Business is good.

"You can't control technology," said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Larry Farrell, president of the National Defense Industrial Association. "There are going to be weapons. There are going to be people who wish other people trouble."

..."You can't control technology," said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Larry Farrell, president of the National Defense Industrial Association. "There are going to be weapons. There are going to be people who wish other people trouble."

Hey, let's get real. There's a demand for arms, and somebody's going to fill it. Right? Somebody's going to get the business, and the profit that goes with it. Why shouldn't it be American companies?

Senior Bush administration officials defended the status quo. U.S. small arms "have not been the weapons that end up in the hands of child soldiers," said Lincoln Bloomfield, assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs. And accelerated sales since Sept. 11, 2001, will help in the war on terrorism, he said. "Most of the major arms exports the U.S. does are to armed forces who are going to do things we want them to do."

Get off the drugs, Lincoln.